Full Bible Timeline

PART I:
EDEN BEFORE THE FALL:
THE WORLD AS GOD CREATED IT

“Paradise was not merely a garden,
 but the sanctuary where heaven and earth met.”
— G.K. Beale

SECTION 1 — EDEN AS THE FIRST TEMPLE

Before the tabernacle, before Solomon’s Temple, before the courts of heaven were revealed to Ezekiel, there was Eden—the original temple of God on earth. Scripture paints Eden not as a simple orchard but as a holy mountain, irrigated by a single river that flowed outward, dividing into four headwaters. This river is not incidental; it is deeply symbolic. In temple typology, water consistently flows from the presence of God (Ezek. 47; Rev. 22).

Temple Parallels

· God walks in the garden as He later “dwells” in the Holy of Holies.

· Adam is placed in Eden to “work” (abad) and “keep” (shamar)—the same Hebrew terms used for the priesthood’s temple duties.

· Precious stones listed in Eden (gold, bdellium, onyx) match the priestly garments and temple ornamentation.

· The Tree of Life mirrors the menorah, a stylized tree of divine light.

· The expulsion from Eden mirrors exile from God’s presence in later temple history.

EDEN AS CENTER OF THE WORLD

The four rivers—Pishon, Gihon, Tigris, and Euphrates—mark Eden as both the geographical and spiritual axis of the ancient world. Scripture portrays Eden not merely as a garden but as an elevated sanctuary from which life flowed outward (Gen. 2:10). Early Jewish tradition affirmed this vertical symbolism. Targum Jonathan and Rashi both speak of Eden as standing above the garden itself, forming a proto–temple structure: the dwelling of God above, the cultivated sanctuary below.

This conception of Eden as a cosmic center finds resonance in later biblical patterns. Jerusalem, likewise described as a city set upon a mountain, functions as the theological “navel” of the world (Ezek. 5:5; 38:12). In Revelation, the New Jerusalem descends as a perfect square—twelve thousand stadia in length and width—echoing temple geometry and enclosing the Tree of Life at its center (Rev. 21–22). The symmetry invites reflection: Eden and the New Jerusalem may represent two bookends of sacred space—one lost through disobedience, the other restored through redemption.

Some have suggested that Eden itself may have been a terrestrial anticipation of the New Jerusalem: a sacred domain ordered around divine presence rather than political boundaries. If Jerusalem stands at the heart of this pattern, the biblical note that humanity was exiled “eastward” from Eden (Gen. 3:24) takes on geographic significance. Roughly seven hundred fifty miles east of Jerusalem lies the Mesopotamian basin, where early postdiluvian civilizations emerged and where Babel later rose in defiance of heaven. To the west lies the Mediterranean basin—today a vast sea, but in some conceptual models understood as a lower-lying region whose present form may reflect catastrophic inundation rather than original design.

​

In modern geological discourse, a mechanism often cited to illustrate such rapid transformation is the so-called Zanclean flood—a hypothesized event in which the collapse of a land barrier at the Strait of Gibraltar allowed Atlantic waters to surge suddenly into the Mediterranean basin, refilling it in a relatively short period of time. While mainstream scholarship assigns this event to deep geological time, the value of the model here lies not in its chronology but in its mechanism. Stripped of its dating assumptions, it demonstrates how the breaching of a natural barrier could result in swift, large-scale geographic change—an idea conceptually consistent with a world reshaped by the Flood and the breaking open of “the fountains of the deep” (Gen. 7:11).

Within such a framework, the Mediterranean basin may be understood not as a timeless sea, but as a region profoundly altered by cataclysm—its former contours obscured by judgment, much as Eden’s original geography has been lost to history. 

These perspectives do not seek to reconstruct Eden on a modern map, but to affirm a biblical principle: the world humanity now inhabits is not identical to the world as it was first ordered.

Within this theological geography, the center matters most. The place where Jesus prayed in Gethsemane, where the cross was raised, and where resurrection was proclaimed may not be incidental. Christian reflection has long perceived the cross itself as a paradoxical Tree of Life—an instrument of death transformed into the means of eternal life (Acts 5:30; Gal. 3:13). Flanked by two crosses, the scene recalls Eden’s tension between life and the knowledge of good and evil, now resolved through grace extended to the repentant heart.

Whether these correspondences are read as literal geography or as sacred patterning, the biblical witness consistently points to Jerusalem as the focus where heaven and earth meet. Eden’s loss and Jerusalem’s redemption together testify that God’s purpose has always been to dwell with humanity at the center—not merely of the land, but of history itself.

“Eden is the archetype of all temples—a sanctuary of divine presence.”
— John H. Walton

SECTION 2 — THE ECOLOGY AND ATMOSPHERE
OF A PERFECT WORLD

Eden’s environment was fundamentally different from our current world, not reshaped by decay or entropy.

Characteristics of the Pre-Fall Environment

· No rain—a mist rose and watered the ground.

· No predators—animals lived without fear or death.

· No disease—cellular decay was nonexistent.

· No weeds—“thorns and thistles” appear after the curse.

· Perfect balance—no competition for resources, no ecological scarcity.

THE WORLD IN PERFECT HARMONY

Modern physics hints at something ancient theologians expressed poetically: creation is built on vibration, resonance, and harmonic structure. String theory’s premise—that everything is vibration—beautifully mirrors the idea that creation “sang” before it groaned (Romans 8:22).

“The universe is a symphony of vibrating strings.”
— Michio Kaku, physicist, string theorist

Adam’s work was not sweaty cultivation; it was holy cultivation, arranging creation like a composer, not a laborer. The Garden was a symphony of life—every plant, animal, and element “in tune” with the presence of God.

“Before sin, the world breathed peace.”
— Matthew Henry

SECTION 3 — ADAM AND EVE:
PHYSIOLOGY, GLORY, AND IMMORTALITY

Adam and Eve were not fragile, mortal, vulnerable beings. 

They were:

· physiologically perfect

· cellularly immortal

· spiritually radiant

· mentally brilliant

· emotionally whole

Their “nakedness” before the Fall did not refer to human anatomy but to innocence, glory, and transparency before God. It was only after the fall that the humanity of their natural nakedness was made evident. The presence of their Father was their covering, their crown, their clothing.

CLOTHED IN THE GLORY OF GOD
Scripture presents a single, coherent story of humanity’s original state, its loss, and its future restoration. When read together, Eden, Sinai, the Transfiguration, and Paul’s teaching on the resurrection are not isolated moments but progressive revelations of the same reality: humanity was created for glory, lost it through the Fall, and will receive it again through Christ.

EDENIC GLORY: HUMANITY BEFORE THE VEIL

The biblical witness affirms that humanity was not merely honored in creation, but visibly crowned with glory. Psalm 8:5 declares that mankind was made “a little lower than the heavenly beings” and “crowned with glory and honor.” The Hebrew language carries the sense of being surrounded, encircled, or clothed with glory—not simply granted status. Glory was not abstract; it was a covering.

This helps explain why Genesis presents Adam and Eve as naked yet unashamed. Shame does not arise from the absence of clothing alone, but from the absence of covering. In Eden, humanity required no garments because they were already clothed—radiant with the presence of God. Their bodies would have emitted divine light in a manner analogous to Moses’ face after prolonged exposure to God’s glory on Sinai (Exod. 34:29). What Moses reflected temporarily, humanity possessed continually.

To fallen eyes, such beings would appear almost alien—not grotesque, but unfamiliar. Scripture repeatedly shows that glory disrupts human expectation. Angels are mistaken for men yet feared. Resurrected bodies are recognizable yet transformed. Edenic humanity belonged closer to this category than to the diminished biology we now call “normal.”

FALLEN BIOLOGY: LIFE AFTER GLORY DEPARTED

After sin, this covering departed.

The first recorded consequence of the Fall was not death, but exposure: “they knew that they were naked.” The loss of glory preceded the sentence of mortality. Humanity became aware of vulnerability because the light that once surrounded them had withdrawn.

What Adam lost was comprehensive:

· immortality

· glory

· unbroken fellowship

· effortless dominion

· perfect perception

· untainted desire

The Fall was not merely a moral failure—it was the loss of divine light. Humanity did not simply begin to die; it began to dim.

Post-Fall biology is marked by decay, fear, toil, and limitation. Bodies age, weaken, and return to dust. Paul later names this condition plainly as corruption, dishonor, and weakness (1 Cor. 15:42–44). This is not an insult to creation, but an acknowledgment that fallen biology is not humanity as designed, but humanity after loss.

RESURRECTION BODIES: GLORY RESTORED (1 CORINTHIANS 15)

Paul’s resurrection theology does not introduce something new—it restores what was lost and perfects it.

“It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption.
It is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory.” (1 Cor. 15:42–43)

The contrast is not between body and non-body, but between two kinds of embodiment. The natural body is animated by mortal life; the spiritual body is fully animated, sustained, and illuminated by God’s life. It is still a body—recognizable, tangible, capable of interaction—but no longer subject to decay, confusion, or death.

At the Transfiguration, Jesus revealed what glorified humanity looks like when the veil is lifted: radiant, luminous, unconstrained by fallen limitation. Paul completes the arc when he writes, “Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the Man of Heaven” (1 Cor. 15:49). Eden was the beginning of this image; resurrection is its fulfillment.

As Irenaeus wrote:

“Man was made for immortality… the soul in tune with God,
the body unmarred by corruption.”

EDEN VS. FALLEN BIOLOGY: A UNIFIED CONTRAST

Edenic humanity and fallen humanity represent two fundamentally different states of existence. In Eden, humanity was clothed in glory rather than skin, unashamed because nothing needed to be hidden, sustained by immortality through unhindered access to God. Life flowed effortlessly—dominion was exercised without toil, perception was clear, desire was untainted, and communion with God was immediate and unveiled. After the Fall, humanity became clothed in skin rather than light, newly conscious of exposure and shame, subject to death and decay. Radiance diminished, fear entered, dominion became labor, perception darkened, and communion with God became mediated. Redemption does not seek to slightly improve this fallen state—it seeks to restore what was lost and complete it forever.

EDEN AS BLUEPRINT

Eden was the world as God intended it—holy, harmonious, radiant with glory. Before death touched creation, every breath echoed divine order. In that first world, Scripture allows us to glimpse not only what humanity was, but what humanity is destined to become again.

Eden is not myth.
It is memory—and prophecy.

Glory is not foreign to humanity.

It is our original clothing, and our promised inheritance.

Eden was the world as God intended it—holy, harmonious, radiant with glory. Before death touched creation, every breath echoed divine order. In this first world we glimpse the blueprint of the world to come.

FOOTNOTES — PART I

1. G.K. Beale, The Temple and the Church’s Mission.

2. Rashi, Commentary on Genesis 2.

3. John Walton, The Lost World of Genesis.

4. Gordon Wenham, Genesis 1–15.

5. Irenaeus, Against Heresies.

6. Matthew Henry, Commentary on Genesis.

7. Targum Jonathan, Genesis 2–3.