top of page
Full Bible Timeline Icon

Full Bible Timeline

Understanding Time - The Great Count
full-bible-timeline-research

FULL BIBLE TIMELINE

DOWNLOAD YOUR COPY IN A  
Digital Format PDF 
for easy study on your mobile device or laptop.

digital-nomads-for-jesus
Understanding Time - The Great Count
The Life of Abraham white paper anchored in the Great Count AM biblical timeline

This study invites the reader to encounter Abraham not as a distant patriarch, but as a living hinge in sacred history—where inherited covenant memory becomes covenant promise. Anchored in the Great Count AM Chronology, it traces faith unfolding in real time through calling, testing, and fulfillment, revealing God’s redemptive purpose advancing not through myth, but through remembered history and measured promise. 


YOUR SUPPORT MEANS A LOT! 

CLICK ON THE BOOK TO PURCHASE OUR E-BOOK 

- AN EASY WAY TO STUDY FROM ANYWHERE

The Life of Abraham

PART VII:
MELCHIZEDEK AND THE COVENANT MEAL


SECTION 16 — BREAD, WINE, AND THE PRIEST OF SALEM

Genesis 14 records one of the most theologically concentrated encounters in the patriarchal narrative. Abram, returning from his first recorded military engagement and having deliberately refused enrichment from corrupt kings, encounters a priest whose appearance is abrupt, unexplained, and decisive. Melchizedek—king of Salem and priest of God Most High—enters the text without introduction, performs a single priestly act, blesses Abram, receives a tithe, and disappears. Though brief, the encounter reverberates across Scripture, shaping the theology of priesthood from Abraham to David, from the Psalms to Hebrews, and ultimately to Christ.


This moment does not establish covenant by blood oath—that occurs later in Genesis 15. Instead, it affirms covenant standing through priesthood and meal. The distinction is essential. Covenant is ratified by blood, but it is recognized, mediated, and affirmed through priesthood. The meal does not create Abram’s covenant status; it publicly affirms that Abram already stands within divine favor before any oath is sworn.


Genesis records the encounter with deliberate economy:

“Then Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; he was priest of God Most High. And he blessed him and said: ‘Blessed be Abram of God Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth; and blessed be God Most High, who has delivered your enemies into your hand.’ And he gave him a tenth of all.”
(Genesis 14:18–20)


No genealogy is supplied. No ritual explanation is offered. Abram does not question Melchizedek’s authority, nor does Scripture defend it. The narrative proceeds as though legitimacy requires no justification. This silence is not accidental; it is structural.


PRIESTHOOD BEFORE THE LAW

Melchizedek’s priesthood precedes Sinai by centuries. He is neither Levite nor descendant of Aaron, yet Scripture applies to him the title kohen—priest—without qualification. This alone destabilizes any claim that priesthood is intrinsically tied to Mosaic legislation.


Psalm 110 later appeals not to Levi, but to this earlier order:

“The LORD has sworn and will not relent,
‘You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.’”
(Psalm 110:4)


By rooting messianic priesthood in Melchizedek rather than Levi, Psalm 110 deliberately reaches back to Abraham’s moment of blessing rather than forward to Sinai. David does not treat Melchizedek as an anomaly; he invokes a priesthood older than the Law and enduring beyond it.


To understand Hebrews’ argument, genealogy must be read juridically, not biologically. Under the Mosaic system, priesthood required documented descent. This was enforceable law. Ezra records:

“These sought their listing among those who were registered by genealogy, but they were not found; therefore they were excluded from the priesthood as defiled.”
(Ezra 2:62; cf. Nehemiah 7:64)


Genealogy functioned as legal authorization. Without it, priestly service was invalid regardless of personal righteousness. Levitical priests were required to recite their lineage back to Levi as legal proof of priestly qualification—both a mark of legitimacy and a prerequisite for service.


Against this backdrop, Hebrews 7:3 reads with precision:

“Without father, without mother, without genealogy…
but made like the Son of God.”
(Hebrews 7:3)


This is not an ontological claim. Hebrews is not asserting that Melchizedek lacked parents or existed eternally. It is a legal-theological argument: his priesthood does not arise from genealogical authorization because it does not belong to the Levitical system at all.


If Abraham recognized a priest whose authority did not arise from lineage—and if Levi was still “in the loins of Abraham” (Hebrews 7:9)—then the later priesthood is subordinate by definition. The question follows naturally: from where does this priesthood arise?


PATRIARCHAL PRIESTHOOD AND THE SHEM TRADITION

The Hebrew Scriptures themselves point toward a priesthood transmitted through righteousness and covenant memory. Adam offers sacrifice. Abel’s offering is accepted. Noah builds an altar immediately after the Flood. Patriarchs act as priests within their households long before Sinai.


Classical Jewish tradition identifies Melchizedek with Shem, son of Noah. Genesis Rabbah states:

“The Holy One wished to bring forth the priesthood from Shem… This is Melchizedek.”
(Genesis Rabbah 46:7)


Targum Jonathan paraphrases Genesis 14:18:

“Melchizedek, king of Jerusalem—he is Shem the Great—
brought out bread and wine.”


The logic is chronological and theological:

· Shem lives during Abram’s lifetime

· Shem bears the covenant blessing (Genesis 9:26)

· Shem preserves knowledge of God after the Flood

· Salem (Jerusalem) lies within later covenant geography


Within the Great Count AM Chronology, the identification is viable:

· Shem born: 1558 AM

· Abram born: 1948 AM

· Melchizedek encounter: after 2023 AM


From this perspective, Melchizedek functions as the final pre-Abrahamic patriarch-priest, mediating covenant blessing through meal and benediction.


THE LIMITS OF IDENTIFICATION

Scripture never explicitly names Melchizedek as Shem. The identification arises from tradition, not textual assertion. Moreover, Psalm 110 presents Melchizedek as an order, not merely an individual. David speaks of a priesthood still operative long after both Shem and Abraham.


Hebrews reinforces this distinction:

“made like the Son of God”
(Hebrews 7:3)

—not beingthe Son of God.


Thus, Melchizedek is best understood as a historical priest whose role foreshadows Christ rather than replacing Him. This preserves both the integrity of Genesis and the uniqueness of the Incarnation.


THE COVENANT MEAL: BREAD AND WINE

Regardless of how the identity question is resolved, the covenant meal remains the passage’s most stable element.


In the ancient Near East, covenant meals ratified peace, affirmed alliance, and recognized authority. Melchizedek offers bread and wine—not sacrifice. Blood covenant follows later in Genesis 15.


The sequence is consistent throughout Scripture:

· relationship precedes law

· blessing precedes obligation

· life precedes death


Jesus later adopts these same elements:

“This is My body… this is My blood of the covenant.”
(Matthew 26:26–28)


The New Testament does not invent covenant symbolism; it fulfills a pattern already embedded in Genesis.


THE TITHE: RECOGNITION OF DIVINE PRESENCE

Abram’s response is immediate:

“And he gave him a tenth of all.”
(Genesis 14:20)


This is the first tithe in Scripture. It is neither commanded nor legislated. It is recognition.


Biblically, the tithe belongs to God Himself (Leviticus 27:30). Priests receive it as mediators, not owners. Abram’s tithe therefore acknowledges God’s presence and authority encountered through priestly mediation.


This has led some interpreters—carefully and illustratively—to observe that the boundary between mediator and manifestation is intentionally thin. Abram gives to God through Melchizedek in a manner later echoed in Christian worship through Christ as eternal High Priest.


Scripture stops short of identification. The tension is deliberate. The tithe does not resolve Melchizedek’s identity; it intensifies the mystery by directing attention away from the priest’s origin and toward the reality he mediates: God Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth.


CHRONOLOGICAL PLACEMENT IN THE GREAT COUNT

· Abram leaves Haran: 2023 AM

· Melchizedek encounter: 2028–2029 AM

· Covenant oath (Genesis 15): c. 2030 AM


Priesthood precedes oath.
Meal precedes sacrifice.
Blessing precedes blood.


SECTION CONCLUSION

Melchizedek does not interrupt Abraham’s story—he explains it.


This encounter reveals that covenant has always required priesthood, that priesthood predates law, and that God’s redemptive order was already established long before Sinai. Abram does not invent faith; he steps into an ancient structure preserved through righteous witnesses and now disclosed openly.


The identity question enriches the passage.
The covenant meal defines it.

Abram is blessed, fed, and affirmed before blood is shed in Genesis 15.


Covenant begins not with death, but with shared life.

Refresh
Full Bible Timeline Icon
bottom of page